To the People Who Read the Violet Evergarden Review and Went Light Novels and Japanese Literature are Bad

In a world deprived of nuance, it is easy to select lines and present them out of context. That’s what has happened to my Violet Evergarden review. You may have seen extracts from it posted on various forums and Twitter as such:

It is such a wonderful book that makes me want to love more and more as I write this post.

But I can’t.

This novel when taken as a whole is so flawed I cannot recommend this book to anyone. Nobody. Even people who are interested in it.

Usually, this is done to invoke spite against a studio hated by a vocal subset of the anime community. This isn’t some isolated issue on 4chan. It is becoming widespread and I feel responsible to a certain degree not because people can’t read but I could have prefaced that I do like light novels and Japanese literature.

The fact is obvious if you do read my blog or Twitter. I have reviews on Japanese novels and other types of media scattered around this blog and; I also contribute to English Light Novels regularly.

Acquiring Violet Evergarden itself requires a stupendous amount of time and money, all of that alleviated by ultimatemegax’s help. He is a huge KyoAni fan and wanted to share something he thought was really good, based on what he liked in volume one. I am still grateful for allowing this opportunity to review the book.

Nevertheless, I have taken all of these issues for granted. The assumption that people can look into more of my stuff after reading the Evergarden review is extremely baseless. That’s why I feel a bit of guilt when I see people easily and irresponsibly use my material to talk shit about light novels and Japanese literature. I could have added a small line or two about my interests in the subject to an already nuanced review and feel regretful for not doing so.

So here’s a whole post dedicated to resolving that and I am writing a letter to the people who have been using my post to advance their racist, sexist crusades against this fine book and studio which I do actually like.

To the people who read the Violet Evergarden review and went light novels and Japanese literature are bad,

Let’s talk for a bit, shall we? You can drop the spears and stop writing death threats to kViN and Megax for a while, right? While I am friends with those you call the “sakuga cartel”, I have no interest in being part of your religious crusades. I have no interest to fight you or them because I am not interested.

This may not matter since who cares what a reviewer thinks. You are right: this review doesn’t matter. It is a review of a novel that will be adapted and modified to suit the anime medium. It may or may not resemble what the anime will be in the future. It may or may not spell the doom of KA Esuma. It may or may not be good. I cannot say that objectively. I don’t recommend the book to anyone, but that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t buy the book if they’re interested. My post is merely a review, a personal opinion on the matter at hand.

But people are using this review as a sign of God from the Old Testament that the Apocalypse is coming. They are using this essentially useless thing as a predictor of the world ending. Cue in criticisms of light novels, Japanese literature, and novels written by women, painting them as inferior creatures that should be euthanized for their poor efforts. Then comes in the criticisms of those criticisms, suggesting the reviewer is a snobbish elitist literary critic.

All is well in the stealth marketing wars. Like all wars, it is senseless and violent. People feel the need to harass others for having different ideas. This allows them to form generalizations of subcultures from opposing sides. Anime fans are sexist. KyoAni fans are cult worshippers. Light novels are shit. There is nothing good in Japanese literature. People who read literature are elitist. They might point to this little review that started it all — I am reminded of Abraham Lincoln meeting the writer of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Harriet Beecher Stowe , and declaring, “So this is the little lady who started the great war.” If you read Uncle Tom’s Cabin, you will find it to be sentimentalist trash suffering from white savior fallacy. It is a horrible little book. So is my review — a horrible little review of a book. Yet, despite people being aware this is a horrible little review, they can’t help but to make it useful and practical in their big, glorious wars. These wars allow them to have these unsavory generalizations that will not be accepted in normal circumstances. Their narratives and agendas will be reinforced by my horrible little review and others to come.

I won’t be the only one whose review will be used as a talking point. Nor is Violet Evergarden an isolated incident. It is this worship and abhorrence of reviews and essays that have caused the visual novel community to be toxic; everyone is searching for the next review on a “kamige” and using that review to validate their prayers or suspicion. I know several people who have confessed that writing visual novel reviews feels dreadful. This idolatry dehumanizes them and makes them uninterested in writing more. Some have left the community because of this. I myself have detached from most of the echo chamber and focused instead to write reviews and articles.

No one can really avoid this curse of being a critic. We can be fans of critics like Anthony Lane, Jim Sterling, and Roger Ebert to the point we are as obnoxious as the stereotypical idol fan. Yet, no matter what how controversial a critic is, they are still human beings. It must be frustrating for them to see their horrible little reviews invite so much hatred and judgmental speculation. They find their articles engulfed in a sea of endless debates. Are films art? Are video games art? And why do people care a lot about how we see those debates. I can’t speak for them, but with my circumstances writing both professionally as an English book reviewer on a literary journal and a blogger on Japanese media I can say it is intolerable. I feel like my psychology is being examined by random people on the internet. It’s not even an argument on taste anymore. Innocuous tweets, Curious Cat answers, and articles/reviews are analyzed for all their worth and then used to mock or worship me. People can point at me for being an insightful researcher of subcultures or a pretentious literary Tumblr cunt. I am neither of those. Nor am I a social justice warrior, a gator, a sakuga nerd, a visual novel fan, a fan of anime, a literature nerd, a history buff, a film lover, a proponent or opponent of censorship, a cynic, an optimist, a realist, a 理系, a 文系, a 文理系, a sexist, a racist, an egalitarian, a libertarian, a Democrat, a Republican, a leader, a follower, a poet, a philosopher, and most importantly a critic.

People do like to think me as a critic because I publish critical reviews of literary publications and offer analysis on various places. However, I don’t see myself as a critic. I don’t see myself as necessary in this “great war” and I certainly don’t see how a horrible little review of mine being a participant of it. Whether one uses my Violet Evergarden review to denounce Japanese literature as inferior or use my Sakura no Uta review to fight back against those claims is of little concern to my beliefs. I may have said something along the lines of how writing these reviews can expand the knowledge about niche subcultures in the past; however, the little help they provide only pushes both sides’ agenda further.

My reason to write comes from a drive to write about things I like to talk about and share. I want to see what other people think about these thoughts. If it brings awareness to a work or a subculture, that will be great. I am merely reviewing for fun, not to pursue a greater truth beyond the clouds. It is a useless activity I enjoy doing and I am glad people have found ways to make meaning out of these horrible little reviews. This shred of hope that people do enjoy what I like to write and read is why I will keep blogging.

This line of reasoning and my review of Violet Evergarden have no application to your holy wars against the wicked forces. Dragging my mental state and my review is like dragging a rooster to a wrestling match — unnecessary and at most, disruptive. Nothing about me or that post have anything to do with your crusades. I may disagree with your actions and could have ranted about that, but what is there to say when I am not in your wars? These wars have nothing to do with me. I have deliberately written my review in such a way it can only be described as wishy-washy. It is not fully negative nor is it positive either. You may be bringing a sword but with closer inspection, you are merely bringing a table knife to battle. You are going to be obliterated by other people if they find that out. Blaming me is pointless as well — as much as I do have that small regret of not adding a disclaimer that I do like Japanese literature and light novels, I have nothing to say. Psychoanalyzing me doesn’t help your fight. It worsens my mental state, yes, but I am a civilian casualty in this said war. I am not an authority figure — a general, if you will. Killing me solves nothing.

You are staring at my powerlessness to control the situation. I am unable to convince most people against their prejudices with my reviews and articles. That is my position because I have no place in this great stealth marketing war. People who decidedly hate on Japanese literature, light novels, or Kyoto Animation don’t need to be moved by a hypothetical positive post by me; they would still find excuses to say I am being bought by big money. Nothing will actually change if I am able to time travel and make different decisions. My horrible little article will be used no matter what, regardless of how impractical any horrible little articles are in wars like these.

This is how little my articles and me matter to the ongoing war. Using my articles and my psychology will in the end cause ridicule to your religious cause. When this letter is posted, it will make the whole debacle even more absurd. My reviews and opinions are not meant to be arsenal; they are just words and punctuation marks that express my thoughts. If you do believe in your causes, find better weapons. I suggest reading the book yourself and forming your opinions to be weapons. You will find that more credible than relying on some reviewer who happen to read a lot of books and have little to zero influence. I have adoring fans who will say otherwise, but in the larger cosmic context my posts have no pageviews. I wield no authority, so I cannot be an authority figure. But you, the people who read my Violet Evergarden review and thought light novels and Japanese literature were bad, can be authority figures. You may be able to explicitly state why they are inferior pieces of art. I like to see you try and create these weapons.

I was one of you people except I was on the other side. My weapons were useless, so I backed out of the war. There are many reasons as to why, but the biggest one comes from this one single fact: These weapons have always been horrible little posts.

What are they going to do in a war like this?

9 thoughts on “To the People Who Read the Violet Evergarden Review and Went Light Novels and Japanese Literature are Bad

  1. qwertµ March 21, 2017 / 6:58 am

    I read the first few paragraphs until it turned into completely incomprehensible rambling. What baffles me the most is that you seem to take issue with the misrepresentation of your review, but the quote you provide leaves no room for interpretation or context as it’s self-contained and absolute in its message.
    Also I take no side in this but to read once again about this stupid sakuga/anti-sakuga conflict is annoying as hell and if the other side annoys you just as much why entertain their stance with reactions like this?

    • Kastel March 21, 2017 / 7:16 am

      I thank you for contributing to this discussion prefacing that you haven’t even read the review thanks to my “incomprehensible rambling” and then believing that extract was not taken out of context. It lends the credibility needed to your comment.

      I believe it isn’t self-contained because it is meant to break with the first half’s expectations and optimism. It is a transition to the latter half where I get critical with the writing. Transitions don’t make sense when taken out of context.

      A better quote would be the conclusion:

      “Even till now, I want to find a way to make this book somehow succeed in my eyes. This love-hate relationship signifies something I desperately want: a novel like Evergarden except good. We need a book like this, much like how we need a dose of Euphonium in our lives. We can’t just read depressing, nihilistic shit forever; we need a book that suggests some sort of meaning, even after the worst has come. And that could have been the purpose of Evergarden. But I can’t be sure about this letter. Who is it for and what is it trying to do?

      “That answer may appear in the anime adaptation and I am still feeling optimistic about it. There is a good chance the anime might be one of the best things ever. But the answer is definitely not in the book.

      “At the very least, I can be certain why parts of the novel is written this way. The purpose of those parts I’m complaining about, that is. ‘I love flowers,’ writes Akatsuki Kana on her bio on the second volume of Violet Evergarden, ‘and I love poetry. But the most fun I have writing is war scenes. I want to be stronger.’

      “That may have very well been the whole review. This is a letter from Akatsuki to herself on how much she loves writing war scenes, not a letter to us readers.”

      It’s less catchier, but it’s definitely more representative of what I feel toward the book than a goddamn transition.

      Also, I take no side either, but I have a personal stake in this because I have been harassed continuously over similar issues like this. I am not entertaining any cause; I am merely following their logic in the trolling. I intentionally wrote this post as such to not be ammunition in any side except my own. I am sure objectively this is silly and ridiculous — you can sip your tea from the balcony if you want — but I’ve kept quiet for four years now. And I’m here now still being harassed engulfed in the stupidest of internet dramas.

      I don’t want to remain a pacifist. If I want to change my situation, I will have no choice but to entertain their cause and see what will happen. I’ve been watching videos and reading articles from various critics who have been inflicted with this kind of shit; they didn’t keep their mouth shut, but they kept on going with the ongoing drama because they want to be sane and believe in their identity. Keeping your mouth quiet is allowing your own identity — your own existence — be rewritten by a bunch of nobodies. I am responsible for a bit on how I am perceived.

      If I don’t fight on how I want to be perceived as a reviewer and instead let people use my review/incomprehensible rambling whatever they want after all this shit, I must be the most fucking stupidest person on the planet.

  2. ren li March 21, 2017 / 10:20 pm

    Aside from a couple of bait threads on 4chan that died off pretty quickly and a reddit post I didnt see anyone care for this review or the Violet light novel in general. It seems to me that you are in an echo chamber, you are not even close to being an “e-celebrity” like you said on Twitter. I get that you wrote this to let everyone know your stance but the few trolls that care for this are having a field day right now; getting a reaction from you seems to be a very easy task, and they wont stop pestering you for a while. But hey, it could also be that you just want attention and are blowing things out of proportion for that very reason.

    That quote about you not wanting to recommend the novel is already part of a copypasta that will be posted in every Violet Evergarden thread on 4chan, this cannot be undone.

    • Kastel March 21, 2017 / 10:54 pm

      Yes, I definitely wanted to be in an echo chamber where I can be paranoid and be the e-celebrity I so not want to be … This is an extremely bizarre claim.

      If you search my name on 4Chan boards, I’m sure you can find some wonderful comments about me as an e-celebrity. Granted, I don’t have it as bad as Moogy, kViN, or others. But it is frustrating.

      I’ve been following the social media response to this post for a while. As I said, it isn’t just happening on 4Chan or Reddit. Of course, it won’t appear on CNN either, but it has been shared throughout forums, Facebook, and Twitter. I can show the statistics as seen here:

      Echo chambers don’t tend to make that many views in a few days, I believe. Nor am I exactly blowing up for proportions that I have been harassed constantly. I’ve been deleting these pieces of garbage.

      I also know it’s part of the copypasta. That just means people can link this post forever and ever and make the copypasta the most boring thing ever. The review is boring. The review is a horrible little thing. The review is nuanced and not useful as a weapon. I’ve made this clear. It is meant to be uninteresting.

      If I’m going to let myself be used as a copypasta, at least let me make my own copypasta.

  3. Anonymouse March 22, 2017 / 4:21 am

    The problem is that everyone close to Moogy follows his style of tweeting. Where things are hyped so strongly that you feel you have to read some eroge/game/book just to confirm that your current taste is not terrible. A similar thing happens in the anime community on websites like myanimelist or youtube channels like Thatanimesnob.

    It’s like people have replaced their real life identities with personas around the stories they like.

    • Kastel March 22, 2017 / 7:25 am

      Who in the world would think that this is a healthy idea? I don’t understand this. If I see someone finding a cool piece of media and talking greatly about it, I don’t go “I must check this in order to confirm my taste is terrible” but rather “that sounds cool, so I’m going to check it out.”

      And for the record, I don’t follow Moogy’s “style of tweeting”. I have been tweeting about media way before I have met the guy. We knew each other because we shared the same deep interests in Japanese media. I have no idea how anyone is perceived to follow his “style”. This is bizarre.

      If people are so annoyed by other people tweeting about things they like, then … just don’t follow them. Mute them in their lives. We aren’t hyping shit for the sake of hyping because we aren’t marketers. We are fans. You can just ignore us and if that makes your life better, good. I ignore certain people in my lives and that makes my life better. I don’t tweet to make people despair that their “taste” is bad nor is it to encourage people to confirm their worldview via me. I tweet for the sake of myself for god’s sake.

      I don’t get this shit. I really don’t. Is this because the internet thinks everything is an anonymous imageboard or something? That people with handle names in a mostly anonymous website must be interested in getting attention and a horde to control? Well, having a Twitter requires you to get a handle name. You can’t be anonymous. Same with WordPress. Same with every other goddamn website that isn’t 4Chan. Why do people feel the need to follow random people like TheAnimeSnob in the anime community? I don’t know who the hell is him and only know that someone posted a link from this blog on one of his videos. I don’t want to know more and that’s fine, isn’t it? I don’t need to know him and I choose I’d rather stop there. The world isn’t going to collapse if I decide to not subscribe to his channel, you know.

      I don’t think people have replaced their real life identities with personas around the stories they like. You can meet a Zelda fan who didn’t metabomb Horizon Zero Dawn. Or you can talk to a Kyoto Animation fan who understands Hyouka isn’t for everyone. I just think people who are insane for this kind of crap don’t seem to realize you can press the unfollow button. Hype from random bozos isn’t going to affect your goddamn life, so you can safely ignore us. J don’t understand how hype from a random person translates to “I must read this to confirm my taste”. I really don’t.

      What is wrong with this world?

  4. Kuuga April 12, 2017 / 10:06 am

    Who’s Lane and Ebert? I’m not being facetious; I always like to learn more about things.

    • Kastel April 12, 2017 / 11:37 am

      Anthony Lane is a New Yorker film critic and his book, Nobody’s Perfect, is a very good introduction and anthology of his reviews. Even if you haven’t seen any of the films he has reviewed, he provides some interesting insight to how he sees film and authorship. He is also the only critic I know who loves Titanic.

      Roger Ebert is one of the most revered film critics and is the reason why Citizen Kane is considered the best film of all time. When he passed away two years ago, the whole of Chicago was in mourning. That is how special he is. His writing is kinda bizarre, but in its eccentricity comes a new wave of thinking. He has shone light to anime, specifically Ghibli films, to a very ethnocentric American audience as well as dominating the discourse on how film reviews should be written. His “Great Movies” books are fun to read as well as “Your Movie Sucks” anthologies that showcase the worst of cinema. I will also recommend watching Siskel & Ebert to see how he debates with another well-loved film critic in real life. The Jurassic Park one is a must-watch in how surreal their reviews become.

      They’re the people I look up to when I do reviews. It’s hard to emulate their style (I also read New York Review of Books writers who are even worse in this regard), but they are the type of critics who I aspire to be someday. I don’t consider myself a “critic”, let alone a good one; I am at most a dilettante with way too much free time. But someday, I want to write stuff as entertaining and insightful as these critics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.